|
Myths have nothing to do with history and should be refuted. ~ Ibn Khaldun
History is written by the winners. ~Alex Haley
The current generation of Bengalis do not recall the great era of the Bengal Sultanate commencing in 1204 CE. This was when Bengal had reached the zenith of civilisation and regional dominance. The Sultanate implemented law and order, enriched the cultural heritage, established justice and brought economic prosperity in the land. It clearly demonstrated how Islam was an integral part of state and society; that it can secure the basic needs and rights of people by providing food, clothing and shelter for all the population, create an infrastructure and exercise independent political thinking on behalf of it's citizens. This secured their interests, unlike the status quo of Bangladesh today.
Although the history is there, Bangladeshis appear to be suffering from amnesia since they cannot remember beyond the immediate history of their land. They are not fully aware of their own past. History is usually coloured by those who have power domestically but is also shaped by dominant international powers of the day who invariably influence others with their thoughts, ideas and their interpretation of history. This is clearly seen in today’s international political climate.
Today, there is an attempt by some to remove the idea of Islam being an integral part of society and state from the minds and hearts of the Bengalis. This will only spell disaster for Bengal , the last two hundred years are witness to its downfall. This is similar to the Bengal tiger being robbed of its stripes. Therefore it is of paramount importance that the Bengalis of today re-connect with their history.
This website is an attempt to elucidate that glorious past of Bengal so that the Bengalis of today can re-discover it and be proud of that golden era of Bengal.
Bengal - Golden Age
The reigns of Sultan 'Ala al-Din Husain Shah (1493–1519) and his son Nasir al-Din Nusrat Shah (1519–32) are generally regarded as the " golden age" of the Bengal sultanate.
In Husain Shah's reign, for example, Bengali Hindus participated in government to a considerable degree: his chief minister (vazīr), his chief of bodyguards, his master of the mint, his governor of Chittagong, his private physician, and his private secretary (dabīr-i khāṣ) were all Bengali Hindus.
In terms of its physical power and territorial extent, too, this was the sultanate's high tide. In the second year of his reign, 1494, Sultan Husain Shah extended the kingdom's northern frontiers, invading and annexing both Kuch Bihar ("Kamata") and western Assam ("Kamrup"). Writing around 1515, Tome Pires estimated this monarch's armed forces at a hundred thousand cavalrymen. "He fights with heathen kings, great lords and greater than he," wrote the Portuguese official, "but because the king of Bengal is nearer to the sea, he is more practised in war, and he prevails over them."
The king thus managed to make a circle of vassals of his neighbors: Orissa to the southwest, Arakan to the southeast, and Tripura to the east.[Prof. Richard M. Eaton, The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier, 1204-1760]
Note: Some governors later became sultans, and in the process changed their names or titles. In the following table, such changes are indicated by arrows [asterisks].
| Governor |
Sultan |
Dates |
| Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526) |
| Muhammad Bakhtiyar |
|
1204–6 |
| Muhammad Shiran Khan |
|
ca. 1206–7 |
| Husam al-Din ‘Iwaz* |
|
ca. 1207–8 |
| ‘Ali Mardan** |
|
ca. 1208–10 |
| |
‘Ala al-Din** |
1210–1213 |
| |
Ghiyath al-Din ‘Iwaz* |
1213–27 |
| Nasir al-Din Mahmud |
|
1227–29 |
| Daulat Shah |
|
1229 |
| Malik ‘Ala al-Din Jani |
|
1229 |
| Saif al-Din Aibek |
|
1229–33 |
| ‘Izz al-Din Tughral Tughan Khan |
|
1233–44 |
| Malik Qamr al-Din Tamar Khan |
|
1244–46 |
| Malik Ikhtiyar al-Din Yuzbak*** |
|
1246–55 |
| |
Mughith al-Din Yuzbak*** |
1255–57 |
| Malik ‘Ala al-Din Mas‘ud Jani |
|
1257–58 |
| ‘Izz al-Din Balban |
|
1258–60 |
| Muhammad Arsalan Khan |
|
1260–ca. 1265 |
| Sher Khan |
|
uncertain |
| Amin Khan |
|
uncertain |
| Mughith al-Din Tughral**** |
|
1268–ca. 1275 |
| |
Mughith al-Din Tughral**** |
ca. 1275–1281 |
| Bughra Khan* |
|
1281–87 |
| Balbani Dynasty (1287–1301) |
| |
Nasir al-Din Mahmud* |
1287–91 |
| |
Rukn al-Din Kaikaus |
1291–1300 |
| Firuz Shahi Dynasty (1301–42) |
| |
Shams al-Din Firuz Shah |
1301–22 |
| |
Jalal al-Din Mahmud |
ca. 1304–9 |
| |
Shihab al-Din Bughday Shah |
1317–18 |
| |
Ghiyath al-Din Bahadur |
1310–12, 1322–25 |
| Nasir al-Din Ibrahim |
|
ca. 1324–26 |
| Ghiyath al-Din Bahadur |
|
1328–33 |
| Qadar Khan (Lakhnauti) |
|
uncertain |
| ‘Izz al-Din Yahya (Satgaon) |
|
uncertain |
| Bahram Khan (Sonargaon) |
|
1328–38 |
| |
Fakhr al-Din Mubarak Shah (Sonargaon) |
1338–49 |
| |
Ikhtiyar al-Din Ghazi Shah (Sonargaon) |
1349–52 |
| |
‘Ala al-Din ‘Ali Shah (Lakhnauti) |
1341–42 |
| Ilyas Shahi Dynasty (1342–1415) |
| |
Shams al-Din Ilyas Shah |
1342–57 |
| |
Sikandar Shah |
1357–89 |
| |
Ghiyath al-Din A‘zam Shah |
1389–1410 |
| |
Saif Hamzah Shah |
1410–11 |
| |
Shihab al-Din Bayazid Shah |
1411–14 |
| |
‘Ala al-Din Firuz Shah |
1414 |
| Raja ganesh dynasty (1415–33) |
| |
Jalal al-Din Muhammad Shah |
1415–32 |
| |
Shams al-Din Ahmad Shah |
1432–33 |
| Restored ilyas shahi dynasty (1433–86) |
| |
Nasir al-Din Mahmud I |
1433–59 |
| |
Rukn al-Din Barbak Shah |
1459–74 |
| |
Shams al-Din Yusuf Shah |
1474–81 |
| |
Sikandar |
1481 |
| |
Jalal al-Din Fath Shah |
1481–86 |
| Abyssinians (1486–93) |
| |
Barbak Shah-zadah |
1486 |
| |
Saif al-Din Firuz Shah |
1486–90 |
| |
Shams al-Din Muzaffar Shah |
1490–93 |
| Husain Shahi Dynasty (1493–1538) |
| |
‘Ala al-Din Husain Shah |
1493–1519 |
| |
Nasir al-Din Nusrat Shah |
1519–32 |
| |
‘Ala al-Din Firuz Shah |
1532 |
| |
Ghiyath al-din Mahmud Shah |
1532–38 |
| Sher Shah Sur and successors (1538–64) |
| |
Sher Shah Sur |
1538 |
| |
(Emperor Humayun) |
(1538–39) |
| |
Sher Shah Sur |
1539–45 |
| |
Islam Shah |
1545–53 |
| |
Shams al-Din Muhammad Shah |
1553–55 |
| |
Ghiyath al-Din Bahadur Shah |
1556–60 |
| |
Ghiyath al-Din II |
1560–63 |
| |
Ghiyath al-Din III |
1563–64 |
| Karrani Dynasty (1564–75) |
| |
Taj Khan Karrani |
1564–65 |
| |
Sulaiman Karrani |
1565–72 |
| |
Bayazid Karrani |
1572 |
| |
Daud Karrani |
1572–75 |
| Mughal Dynasty (1526–1858) |
| Mun‘im Khan |
|
1574–75 |
| Husain Quli Beg |
|
1575–78 |
| Muzaffar Khan Turbati |
|
1579–80 |
| Mirza ‘Aziz Koka |
|
1582–83 |
| Shahbaz Khan |
|
1583–85 |
| Sadiq Khan |
|
1585–86 |
| Wazir Khan |
|
1586–87 |
| Sa‘id Khan |
|
1587–94 |
| Man Singh |
|
1594–1606 |
| Qutb al-Din Khan Koka |
|
1606–7 |
| Jahangir Quli Beg |
|
1607–8 |
| Islam Khan Chishti |
|
1608–13 |
| Qasim Khan Chishti |
|
1613–17 |
| Ibrahim Khan |
|
1617–24 |
| Mahabat Khan |
|
1625–26 |
| Mukarram Khan |
|
1626–27 |
| Fidai Khan |
|
1627–28 |
| Qasim Khan Juyini |
|
1628–32 |
| ‘Azam Khan Mir Muhammad Baqar |
|
1632–35 |
| Islam Khan Mashhadi |
|
1635–39 |
| Prince Muhammad Shuja‘ |
|
1639–60 |
| Mu‘azzam Khan (Mir Jumla) |
|
1660–63 |
| Shaista Khan |
|
1664–78 |
| Fidai Khan |
|
1678 |
| Prince Muhammad ‘Azam |
|
1678–88 |
| Khan Jahan Bahadur Khan |
|
1688–89 |
| Ibrahim Khan |
|
1689–97 |
| Prince ‘Azim al-Din (‘Azim al-Shan) |
|
1697–1712 |
| Murshid Quli Khan (Ja‘far Khan) |
|
1713–27 |
| Shuja‘ al-Din Muhammad Khan |
|
1727–39 |
| Sarfaraz Khan |
|
1729–40 |
| Aliwardi Khan |
|
1740–56 |
| Siraj al-Daula |
|
1756–57 | |
Sometime in 1243–44, residents of Lakhnauti, a city in northwestern Bengal, told a visiting historian of the dramatic events that had taken place there forty years earlier. At that time, the visitor was informed, a band of several hundred Turkish cavalry had ridden swiftly down the Gangetic Plain in the direction of the Bengal delta. Led by a daring officer named Muhammad Bakhtiyar, the men overran venerable Buddhist monasteries in neighboring Bihar before turning their attention to the northwestern portion of the delta, then ruled by a mild and generous Hindu monarch. Disguising themselves as horse dealers, Bakhtiyar and his men slipped into the royal city of Nudiya. Once inside, they rode straight to the king’s palace, where they confronted the guards with brandished weapons. Utterly overwhelmed, for he had just sat down to dine, the Hindu monarch hastily departed through a back door and fled with many of his retainers to the forested hinterland of eastern Bengal, abandoning his kingdom altogether.
This coup d’état inaugurated an era, lasting over five centuries, during which most of Bengal was dominated by rulers professing the Islamic faith. In itself this was not exceptional, since from about this time until the eighteenth century, Muslim sovereigns ruled over most of the Indian subcontinent. What was exceptional, however, was that among India’s interior provinces only in Bengal—a region approximately the size of England and Scotland combined—did a majority of the indigenous population adopt the religion of the ruling class, Islam. This outcome proved to be as fateful as it is striking, for in 1947 British India was divided into two independent states, India and Pakistan, on the basis of the distribution of Muslims. In Bengal, those areas with a Muslim majority would form the eastern wing of Pakistan—since 1971, Bangladesh—whereas those parts of the province with a Muslim minority became the state of West Bengal within the Republic of India. In 1984 about 93 million of the 152 million Bengalis in Bangladesh and West Bengal were Muslims, and of the estimated 96.5 million people inhabiting Bangladesh, 81 million, or 83 percent, were Muslims; in fact, Bengalis today comprise the second largest Muslim ethnic population in the world, after the Arabs.[Prof. Richard M. Eaton, The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier, 1204-1760]

|